|
Boost : |
From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-27 22:06:44
David Abrahams wrote:
>"Klaus Nowikow" <nowikow_at_[hidden]> writes:
>You're wrong. *this is copied before it is thrown. Still, the idiom
>above seems a bit suspicious, unless you somehow prevent derivation
>from errorcheck.
So is it possible to prevent derivation? If not, then at least make it
harder to do so (and put a warning in the docs)?
Also, would a non-derivable class be a good addition to C++0x?
Regards,
Reece
_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk