From: Reid Sweatman (drunkardswalk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-28 03:08:45
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of David Abrahams
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 5:03 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Re: Suggestion: link to the libraries page
> not easy to find
> Marcello Pietrobon <teiffel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > Thank you for both nice answers.
> > I definitely must be tired.
> Maybe, but I think we have a real problem.
> > Or maybe for a person knowing where to go it is obvious, but not for
> > the other people,
> Yeah, I think the current organization is pretty confusing. I suggest
> one top-level link:
> Documentation - points to complete docs for latest
> A link to the up-to-date docs for the CVS should be hidden away
> (slightly) on the page targeted by the above link. It could be
> Generated Docs (Nightly Build) - points to subset of docs that are
> generated from boostbook sources,
> with a clear note at the top of
> the link's target page saying that
> it's only a subset of the complete
> or, better:
> Nightly CVS docs - Integrates the boostbook docs rebuilt nightly
> with a the docs that are stored in CVS as HTML,
> yielding a page with the same format as the
> "Documentation" page. The non-boostbook docs
> can be acquired via nightly download or simply
> linked-to using CVSWeb.
Although I elsewhere and severally retracted my original comments as being
slightly to the left of reality, I think the organization you suggest is
somewhat better than the existing one. So one person throws his nickle on
the grass for this one, in any event.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk