From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-02 09:35:11
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Unknown, since nobody spoke up since http://tinyurl.com/2mqkr. IMO we
>>> should just restore the status quo.
>> Problem is that it's unknown what the status quo was. The current
>> status is that the following MIME types are let through:
>> but HTML will be converted to plaintext.
> My mailman installation says:
> "Leave this field blank to skip this filter test."
> so maybe it should be really left blank? The set of reasonable extension is
> hard to guess in advance (at least .diff, .patch, .log, .out are possible,
> but who knows...)
I think the goal is to prevent viral intrusion and unreasonably large
downloads. That said, we probably have enough safeguards in place
with the "first-post-moderated" policy and posting size limits that
you're probably right. As long as HTML is still being converted to
plaintext, I don't forsee any problems.
Objections to clearing the MIME type filter field, anyone?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk