|
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-07 13:10:11
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:46:27 -0400, Edward Diener wrote
> In the Date-Time library documentation for 1.31, the link from Class
> day_clock takes me to the Construction From Clock section of the
> class Date. Is that correct ?
Yes.
>I was expecting to be taken to
> documentation for class day_clock's constructors and member
> functions. Is this a way of saying that day_clock has only a default
> constructor and the member functions local_day() and universal_day() ?
Acutally, it has only static functions to return local and UTC day. Didn't
seem worth it's own page in the documentation for 2 functions...
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk