From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-12 07:13:59
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> I don't have any opinion yet.
> > I guess I didn't know that I was "misusing" bind(). Anyway, I find it
> > that
> > bind(foo,_1)(i) and bind(foo,i)() differs.
> Naturally it has to differ.
> bind(foo,i) needs to take a copy of i,
> or we wouldn't be able to do things like:
> int square(int);
> function<void(void)> f(int x)
> return bind(square, x * 5);
My point is that if the prototype was
void square( int& );
function< void(void) > f( int x )
return bind( square, x*5 );
should not compile. It should only compile with a call to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk