From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-13 10:31:44
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Shouldn't we be setting
>> BOOST_FUNCTION_SCOPE_USING_DECLARATION_BREAKS_ADL for this compiler?
>> It's actually a different bug in some details, I realize, but the
>> macro does say the right thing.
>> Also, where is the test for that macro? I don't see any in
> Well a quick grep would have found boost_no_using_breaks_adl.cxx and it's
> associated cpp test files.
> Have you reported this one as a bug to Intel?
I don't remember. Probably. I think they just claimed "vcxxx bug
compatibility" and went back to sleep ;-)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk