From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-14 10:31:23
Thorsten Ottosen ha escrito:
> [...] index::list should be sufficient.
Still, I don't like "list" alone. If an using directive is in affect, then
does not read so well, as it is not clear (IMHO) what list is supposed
to be introducing. Compare with:
What do you think?
> I still think that namespace container would be wrong. The container's
> name will be long enough to be in namespace boost and everything that
> supports it's setup of indexes can be put in namespace index (or a struct
> index) and have index stripped
> from their name.
I think I agree with not using boost::container for now.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk