[boost] Re: cycle_iterator update

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-14 15:40:54

"Neal D. Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I got benchmarks about 1/2 speed of hand-written implementation for all
> versions of the cycle_iterator until I added operator[].  

You mean you were testing the speed of your iterator's operator[]?
That's not a very important test.  operator[] is one of the least-used
iterator operations.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com