From: Dill, John (john-dill_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-15 11:52:19
> So in summary, you weren't confused about how the library works; you
> just were unhappy that you had no justification for how it works.
> That lends no credence to your claim that "the counter-intuitiveness
> of the semantics will lead to subtle bugs in people's code who
> misunderstand or forget bind's behavior in this area."
> P.S. if you want to understand the justification, see
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk