Re: [boost] Re: [indexed_set] revised naming proposal

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-15 12:19:24

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Joaqu=EDn=20M=AA=20L=F3pez=20Mu=F1oz?= <joaquin_at_[hidden]>
> Matthew Vogt ha escrito:
> [...]
> 
> > multi_index_container
> > <
> >   employee,
> >   indexed_by<
> >     ordered_unique<member<employee,string,&employee::name> >,
> >     ordered_non_unique<member<employee,int,&employee:age> >,
> >   >
> > >
> >
> 
> I love this name "indexed_by"! If noone complains, this will go. Thanx
> for the tip!

I agree.  It fits well.

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;