From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard (jbms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-16 02:07:26
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Why not use an MPL sequence of indexes in the first place?
> Well, this has been previously discussed before. The rationale is that
> I'd like to isolate common users from MPL as much as possible. Imagine
> the tutorial somehow pointed to the MPL reference for a forward
> compile-time sequence: IMHO, many readers would scare away. Which
> percentage of *users* of Boost are acquainted with such a complex
> library as MPL? MPL is an extremely powerful library, but I honestly don't
> expect it to to be part of the common knowledge shared by the C++
But aren't you just effectively aliasing or reproducing mpl::list in
your "index_list"? I do not see that as a very good solution. If you
want to use a type users might be more familiar with, you could allow
them to use boost::tuple to specify the index types.
As I said in a previous message though, what I would really like to see
would be allowing specifying the indices directly as parameters to the
container template, as a convenience syntax.
-- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk