Boost logo

Boost :

From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-16 14:23:43

We experience compiler errors using MIPSpro C++ under IRIX. The problem goes
away if we apply this patch:

Index: boost/config/posix_features.hpp
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/config/posix_features.hpp,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -r1.15 posix_features.hpp
< # if defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500)

> #        if defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE+0 >= 500)
I can check this in, but I wanted to ask first if the "+0" was left off
intentionally. It seems unlikely because "+0" is used consistently everywhere
else, but just in case, is my patch OK?
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at