Boost logo

Boost :

From: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-17 04:25:44


Rob Stewart writes:
 
> That makes the result of the expression quite explicit. I can't
> see any problems with that approach. I'd expect an exception if
> the resulting month doesn't have the requested day. OTOH, if
> date's ctor were to take an extra argument, or if there was a
> date factory function supplying the different behavior, you could
> specify that you want clipping to the last day of the designated
> month:
>
> date(d.month() + 2 * months, d.day(), clip_to_eom)
> make_date_clipped_to_end_of_month(d.month() + 2 * months,
> d.day())
>

IMHO, simple date wrappers can give more readability:

    d.allow_clipping_to_eom() + 2*months;
    d.disallow_clipping_to_eom() + 2*months;

or

    allow_clipping_to_eom(d) + 2*months;
    disallow_clipping_to_eom(d) + 2*months;

where adding months to date directly isn't allowed.

Regards,
Janusz


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk