From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-18 20:52:50
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:42:10 -0400, Neal Becker wrote
> > [...] and we can sure that one of the things MS will do between
> > now
> > and then is resolve as many boost problems as they reasonably can.
> What makes you so sure that resolving boost problems is a priority
> for MS? It took them years to even acknowlege that there was a C++ standard.
Well for one thing, they actaully call out support for 'Boost', 'Loki', etc on
the back of the box for VC. Of course, last time I checked the regression
tests VC7.1 was at 100% so it doesn't seem that there's much to resolve...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk