Re: [boost] date-generators (was Date-Time)

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-20 14:37:07

From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:22:53 -0400 (EDT), Rob Stewart wrote
> >
> > That does make sense, but so does the "date wrapper" idea.  The
> > latter provides a convenient means to use operator overloading
> > meaningfully while making the behavior of those operators
> > specific to the wrapper type.  I think the date wrapper approach
> > will prove easier to use, but more cumbersome to implement.
> 
> I have no idea what the 'date wrapper approach' is...

It took a little bit, but I tracked down the message.  I had
deleted it by the time you asked.

http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/2053807

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;