|
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-25 17:30:16
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:12:16 +0200, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote
> Slightly OT: this issue of POI could be taken a little
> further to allow interoperability between (not necessarily
> template-based) libraries without the headache of having
> to include portions of them. This is what I have in mind:
> ...detail omitted...
Interesting...yep that probably works. Makes you need to rethink what
dependency means...
> Totally OT: I've posted a question regarding multi_index
> and composite keys a few posts ago. You being one of the
> reviewers, your opinion on that is greatly appreciated :)
I haven't been able to get around to reading the thread -- I'll try to get to
it later...
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk