From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-05 19:52:44
"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> John Torjo <john.lists_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>In the "looping construct" thread, a while ago David Abrahams said
>>>that we should do a test, to compare all looping solutions.
>>>I've made such a test. It tests against:
>>>- keeping internal functions in crange<>
>>>- virtual functions
>>>comparing to using raw iterators.
>> Where can we see the results?
> I noticed they were included in the .zip file John sent.
I didn't see an attachment.
> Here is the summary:
> Averages for 128000elements (except first test):
> raw time : 229.127 secs
> func calls : 323.871 secs (avg percentage 183.074)
> vtable calls: 307.038 secs (avg percentage 174.966)
> foreach calls: 236.767 secs (avg percentage 104.929)
Note too that other compilers may exhibit different tradeoffs.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk