From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-13 19:41:37
I was just bitten by an extremely nasty bug, caused in part by my own
foolishness, but also by a subtlety of Boost Regex that probably should be
http://boost.org/libs/regex/doc/format_syntax.html gives a list of "The
following Perl like expressions" and says that $N "Expands to the text that
matched sub-expression N."
HOWEVER, Boost Regex is sufficiently general that $10 will match the tenth
subexpression, $25 the twenty fifth, and so forth. Perl is not that general
- it recognizes only $1 through $9 here.
I believed that Boost behaved like Perl. I concatenated "$1" with a random
hexadecimal string, occasionally producing "$10", "$15", etc. before the
letter hexits appeared. This led to many hours of misery.
The documentation should note Boost Regex's generality. The generality is a
good thing - $1 can be separated from later digits with empty () parentheses
- but it needs to be made clear.
Does this also affect the regex standardization proposal? It'd be bad if
some implementers thought they only had to support $1 - $9.
On an unrelated note, the following issues have not yet been addressed:
Lambda Doc Bug, http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg64450.php
Boost Array Documentation,
Stephan T. Lavavej
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk