Date: 2004-05-14 02:58:08
Robert Ramey wrote:
>Martin Ecker wrote:
>> One way of achieving all this would, of course, be to derive from one
>> the existing archive classes and add the required functionality.
>> However, we don't want to lose the flexibility of being able to write
>> out data to a binary, text, XML, or any other archive with some other
>> kind of representation. So basically we're looking for a good way of
>> inserting an additional layer in between the archives and the actual
>> serialize functions that can store state variables.
>Have you consider making a template which takes the base class as a
Ah, that's a nifty idea. I'll investigate this some further, but I
believe this is just what we need.
Industrie- und Unterhaltungselektronik GmbH & CoKG
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk