From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-14 09:26:16
"Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On Friday 14 May 2004 09:28 am, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> > libs/test/src/execution_monitor.cpp: No such file or directory
> > There should be ..boost/libs directories installed with all source (cpp)
> > and docs files files. I remember it was reported already that some
> > procedure does not install it.
> I strongly disagree. The headers in $BOOST_ROOT/boost should be
> self-contained, and their use should require only prebuild libraries
> (.a, .so, .dll, .lib, etc).
> If as a developer you need to access ../boost/libs, then I suggest those
> be moved into $BOOST_ROOT/boost.
I don't really mind.
There are 2 cases when you need to include files from libs/src. Minimal
testing component is using src/execution_monitor.cpp and included versions
of Boost.Test offline component in boost/test/included also require all
other files. Both where requested by 'no library users'. But at the time
nobody requested to move sources into headers directory.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk