RE: [boost] Re: Latest ScopeGuard

From: Max Khesin (MKhesin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-14 13:51:28

This is funny in the light of Robert R.'s remark that you boostified his
version. Anyway it seems like a high priority that the more experienced
boost guys should get a basic version of this pushed through before we get
20 slightly different versions sneaking in via the libraries being
incorporated into boost. Consensus may be more important than perfection at
this stage.
max.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pavel Vozenilek [mailto:pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 2:02 PM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: [boost] Re: Latest ScopeGuard

"Max Khesin" <MKhesin_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I recall there have been sevral attempts at a boostified version of Andrei
> A. ScopeGuard. I want to start using this functionality and was wondering
> a) if there is any consensus about best/most boost-consistent
implementation
> b) if there is there is a version in the library approval pipeline (or
some
> definite plans for including this functionality in boost)
> thanks,
>
Multi index container library includes ScopeGuard (almost verbatim
from Andrei) until some boost-wide solution appears.

/Pavel

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.