From: Cromwell Enage (sponage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-16 18:56:15
--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Did you compile it? If so, on what compilers?
My main development compiler is MinGW 3.2; I haven't
actually tested it on MSVC 6.
> I can't see how it could possibly work.
I just read that not all compilers support inline
initialisation of member constants. Arrgh!
> #include <boost/config.hpp>
> template <typename RealNum>
> struct sample_t
> BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(RealNum, base = 5.0);
> BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(RealNum, power = 1.0);
> BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(RealNum, angle = 1.234);
> is an illegal program (try comeau online to see some
> reasons why).
I was hoping BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT would work on more
than just integral types.
> Also, it's not very mpl-ish. Nothing seems to
> follow the metafunction protocol of operating on
> and returning types.
Oh, okay. I'll keep this protocol in mind the next
time I try to write MPL metafunctions. Right now, it
seems I can't directly use templates anyway for this
> I hate to be discouraging; it's probably a really
> interesting idea.
No problem. I have a need for this sort of thing
myself, so I'll definitely keep working at it.
> I am only looking as far as some details of the
> implementation, here.
I'll look into Boost.Preprocessor to see if I can
implement my functions via macros. I'll send another
email when I have results.
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk