From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-18 08:51:21
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:17:23PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > Quite the contrary, I think we need to respect compiler switches, but not
> > > library settings. Anyway, this is only important if we can get gcc to
> > > reliable report -pthread presense.
> > Which should happen for 3.4.1.
> That's good. Did gcc developers decided to add this? Do you have link to email
> thread (if any)?
Only the bug tracker, which is here:
Wolfgang Bangerth had no objection to the idea of a __GXX_PTHREADS
macro defined when -pthread is given, and Andrew Pinski targeted the
bug for GCC 3.4.1 - so it looks to me as though they're happy with it
and a fix will land before the next compiler release.
I've been meaning to prepare a patch myself (after digging through the
relevant files and figuring out how they work) but all my GCC time in
the last few days has been spent fixing libstdc++'s implementation of
the boost concept checks (which were also broken in 3.4.0).
-- "A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it." - Oscar Wilde
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk