Re: [boost] Ranged type mini-library submission

From: christopher diggins (cdiggins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-18 14:36:44

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Ranged type mini-library submission

> On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:06:12 -0400 (EDT), Rob Stewart wrote
>
> > > I don't feel particularly inclined to respond to your questions or
concerns
> > > until you invest at least the minimum of effort required to take a
look at
> > > the code and read the other posts related to this topic.
> >
> > Fine.  You can justify your belligerence all you like.  I thought
> > I made some cogent arguments, despite the possibility of being
> > slightly off course.  A simple course correction from you would
> > have sufficed.
>
> I agree with Rob here, dismissing his point of view this this way was out
of
> line.  Ironically, Rob was playing the role of the naive user since he
hadn't
> looked at the code. Anyway, you could simply post a small code snippet in
your
> email that illustrated why your point of view without expecting him to
keep up
> with the latest revision.  Frankly, I hadn't even looked at the test_cv
stuff
> until this morning when I was trying to make the conversation more
concrete.
>
> >Since you prefer to attack rather than engage me,
> > I'll leave the discussion to you and Jeff.
>
> Please don't do that.  All that will assure is an inferior design -- one
that
> might not stand up to a review...
>
> Jeff

I am going to be recusing myself from submitting the constrained_value
library to boost. Obviously the work I have done up until this point is in
the public domain, so I welcome others to continue to build on the work so
far.

Christopher Diggins
http://www.cdiggins.com
http://www.heron-language.com