[boost] Re: [Boost.Test] New testing procedure?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-23 01:30:15

"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I think I'm becoming comfortable with the idea. It does complicate things, 
> however. For instance, now the library author would have to look into twice
> as much reports to determine the state of her library (superseding the old 
> "torture" results with the new "basic" ones would make the whole thing
> useless).

A really slick system would integrate weekly and daily
results into one table, but as you said, it gets complicated
somewhere.  In this case, it's in the results processing.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com