From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-23 10:36:26
"Stephan T. Lavavej" <stl_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> A DR would be in place: either explicitly mention that
>> side-effects (of the sort that modify the values in the
>> sequence) are not allowed, or move for_each to mutating algs.
>> Volunteer to raise that and provide wording?
> I don't believe that a DR is necessary given the phrasing in TC++PL, which
> is reasonably authoritative (though lacking Standard force).
They're not in the same domain. What *any* book other than the
standard says has no bearing on whether a DR is appropriate.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk