From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-23 11:08:57
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I am using simple class properties facility for some time and found it quite
> useful. Actually it's nothing fancy - simple helper classes to eliminate
> repetitive setter/accessor methods (and no need for language extensions).
If you are making designs that would normally have a lot of getters
and setters, it suggests that they may have an insufficient level of
abstraction. Of course, that isn't neccessarily the case -- but it
does seem to be the rule in my code. I personally don't have a need
for this facility and I don't think I want a library that would
encourage that style.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk