Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-25 07:39:38

Next message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm]"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: [Test] Intel 8 seems to need workaround"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Re: STL algorithm for containers (was Re: Re: boost/test/detail/algorithm.hpp: request forpromotionand/or fast review)"

"Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:200405250950.54149.ghost_at_cs.msu.su...
| Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
| > | Oh! I missed it somehow. Is there plans for review request? I would
| > | second it.
| >
| > not really. John Torjo is doing something similar though.
|
| Frankly, I think this is deplorable situation.

actually we should think it is a good thing because it means that competing libraries
have emerged and several designs have been discussed.

| BTW, Thorsten, why you say there are [no] plans for review request?

Well, I think what John is doing is slightly better. And he do intend to request a review.

br

Thorsten

Next message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm]"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Re: [Test] Intel 8 seems to need workaround"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Re: STL algorithm for containers (was Re: Re: boost/test/detail/algorithm.hpp: request forpromotionand/or fast review)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk