[boost] Re: [Test] Intel 8 seems to need workaround

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-25 11:46:09

> Hi John, I think I have reduced the problem to an actual bug in EDG:
>
> class A
> {
> protected:
>   int x;
> };
>
> class AA:public A
> {
> public:
>   using A::x;
> };
>
> class TT;
>
> class T
> {
> public:
>   class foo:public A // <<-- foo is the culprit!
>   {
>     friend class TT;
>   };
> protected:
>   AA aa;
> };
>
> class TT:public T
> {
> public:
>   void foo(){aa.x=0;}
> };
>
> int main()
> {
> }

How presence of unrelated class foo affects access in class AA?
Is it important that method is called foo also?

Gennadiy.