[boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm]

From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-27 11:53:16

David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:

> 
> Darryl Green <darryl.green <at> unitab.com.au> writes:
> 
> > Maybe I'm just being thick, but the whole idea of a failing exit action 
seems 
> > rather odd to me. This has nothing to do with whether the exit action is a 
> > destructor or not. The state is trying to take a transition, it basically 
has 
> > done so, the transition action has run
> 
> If exit actions happen after transition actions...

They don't. In any transition all exit actions are executed first, then the 
transition action and finally all entry actions.

Regards,

Andreas