From: Andreas Huber (ah2003_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-27 11:53:16
David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
> Darryl Green <darryl.green <at> unitab.com.au> writes:
> > Maybe I'm just being thick, but the whole idea of a failing exit action
> > rather odd to me. This has nothing to do with whether the exit action is a
> > destructor or not. The state is trying to take a transition, it basically
> > done so, the transition action has run
> If exit actions happen after transition actions...
They don't. In any transition all exit actions are executed first, then the
transition action and finally all entry actions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk