From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-28 08:17:04
Pavol Droba wrote:
> I haven't been following this thread, however I see, that you
> are proposing a functionality, that overlap with the string algorithm
> For instance, trim functionality is already there, and if basic_cstring
> can provide Collection/Range compatible interface, it will work straight away.
> Have a look into boost/algorithm/string
First of all I agree that we should not implement overlapping
functionality in different boost libraries but OTOH I don't know why the
developer of the test library implements its own string class.
I do would like to remark that we should minimise dependencies in the
test-tools libraries and make them as lightweight as possible. Because
if the test tools don't compile, they can't be used to verify if the
rest compiles !?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk