[boost] Re: [prereview request][fsm]

From: Darryl Green (darryl.green_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-29 01:02:00

Darryl Green <darryl.green <at> unitab.com.au> writes:
> This change would also allow an action's context be to be the source state - 
> or would there still be some problem with that? Does the context really have 
> to be an outer state of the destination as well as the source?

To answer my own question - If transitions actually occur before destructors 
run as per my proposal, then the source state itself, and all its outer state 
contexts exist so the restriction of only common outer contexts being available 
is removed.