[boost] Re: [fsm] Why exit actions must not fail

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-30 07:23:32

"Andreas Huber" <ah2003_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Furthermore, it
>> seems as though, if you want that behavior, it's trivial to get it by
>> wrapping the FSM in a derived class whose destructor finalizes the
>> state machine.
>
> Yes, but only at the cost of making the current interface (and
> implementation) more complex (we'd need to have at least a separate
> exit() function, right?).

No.  At the moment we're just talking about whether A1 is justified.
Whether or not exit actions should use destructors is a separate
question.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com