Boost logo

Boost :

From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-02 21:34:08


> there is already a huge investment in other languages (such as
> GSL, which is written in C), this will be a significant hurdle.

I've not used the GSL: would it benefit in either usability (*) or
efficiency if it used C++ templates/objects? If so I wonder if the GSL
authors would be open to a dual, boost-compatible license so that a boost
library could borrow code as it needed to, rather than having to re-invent
the wheel.

Darren

*: e.g. see:
   http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/gsl-ref_2.html#SEC17


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk