From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-02 22:14:10
"Walter Landry" <wlandry_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Darren Cook <darren_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > If so I wonder if the GSL authors would be open to a dual,
> > boost-compatible license so that a boost library could borrow
> > code as it needed to, rather than having to re-invent the wheel.
> Almost certainly not. They are not even willing to entertain going to
> the LGPL. There used to be a blurb on their website saying that if
> you can't handle the GPL, then use something else.
Do you suppose it's legal to write a Boost-compatible C++ interface
on top of GSL?
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.691 / Virus Database: 452 - Release Date: 5/26/2004
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk