|
Boost : |
From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-05 06:48:46
Hi all,
I am implementing test cases to validate the implementation of my
fixed_string class and basic_string_impl (based on flex_string) and noticed
a defect in the implementation of:
template< typename InputIterator >
inline string_type & replace( iterator i1, iterator i2, InputIterator j1,
InputIterator j2 );
It handles the Integral case fine, but when the InputIterators are actually
iterators, it asserts false, where the standard dictates it returns:
replace( i1, i2, basic_string( j1, j2 ));
or equivalent behaviour, e.g. in the implementation I'm using:
replace( i1, i2, std::distance( j1, j2 ), char_type());
std::copy( j1, j2, i1 );
Is there any specific reason for this, or is it an implementation bug?
Regards,
Reece
_________________________________________________________________
Want to block unwanted pop-ups? Download the free MSN Toolbar now!
http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk