From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-05 22:13:51
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:ur7stqvrd.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
| "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > My current view is that Boost.Range should contain both itarator_range<> and range<>,
| > but that range-based algorithms should use range<>
| If I understand you correctly, it sounds a bit rigid. Would you not
| provide a range-based lower_bound as a matter of principle, or what?
I'm not sure I understand. Could you give an example?
(remark: range<> would be less flexible than iterator_range<> since its template parameter is an ExternalRange, but it would provide
higher abstraction level. )
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk