Boost logo

Boost :

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-05 22:13:51

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > My current view is that Boost.Range should contain both itarator_range<> and range<>,
| > but that range-based algorithms should use range<>
| If I understand you correctly, it sounds a bit rigid. Would you not
| provide a range-based lower_bound as a matter of principle, or what?

I'm not sure I understand. Could you give an example?

(remark: range<> would be less flexible than iterator_range<> since its template parameter is an ExternalRange, but it would provide
 higher abstraction level. )


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at