From: Darryl Green (darryl.green_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-06 19:21:44
Andreas Huber <ah2003 <at> gmx.net> writes:
> Ok, convinced. I need to check how much work this is and whether there are
> any side effects but I don't see much of a problem at the moment. What would
> you say about BOOST_FSM_RELAX_TRANSITION_CONTEXT? It's a little long, do you
> have a better idea?
No. It is a good descriptive name and I can't think of a shorter one that is
> Hope you can live with a global switch instead of a per-machine policy.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk