From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-07 09:26:08
"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:126.96.36.199.2.20040607070211.0486b980_at_mail.rudbek.com...
| I disagree.
with what? It's hard to know when you top-post :-(
| specifically I belive we should take the time to write the syntactic sugar
| which allows ALL of the current algorithms to accept range<>s (that's the
| plural of range<>, not some variable "s").
I can't figure out what that has to do with the discussion :-) I too like range version of
std::copy() etc. To recap, I'm saying
pair<iterator,iterator> foo( iterator, iterator );
in its range version should be
range< Range > foo( Range& );
iterator_range< typename iterator_of<Range>::type > foo( Range& );
Pavol disagrees, that makes the situation a 1 against 1 until other people
start having an opinion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk