From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-08 18:15:25
Hurd, Matthew wrote:
>>Behalf Of scott
>>Assume use of a technique like the following (think this has been
>>presented as "object shim"?);
>> static T *p = new T;
>> return *p;
>>as a means of dealing with global construction issue, i.e. instead
>>of expressions like "anastasia.data_member" the usage is
>>"anastasia().data_member". Also assume that some of these global
>>objects (i.e. shims) deploy mutexes for MT reasons. What happens
>>when there is more that one thread running around making calls
>>to shims? Instantiation of the global itself becomes an MT issue.
> That's what the double-checked locking pattern for singletons is for.
> Matt Hurd.
No, the double-checked locking pattern is only good as the subject of
talks describing why it's not good for anything.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk