From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-11 05:17:18
> Is there a good reason that the config library needs to use a
> "creative" choice of file extensions rather than the boost standard
> of ".*pp"?
Well they're not really complete .cpp files, and they're not headers as such
either - more like snippets of code that get #included by various other
files (the .cpp ones, and the configure script), so I wanted something
distinctive to separate them from regular source and header files.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk