From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-11 06:31:49
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" <larsbj_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> Is there a good reason that the config library needs to use a
> >> "creative" choice of file extensions rather than the boost
> >> of ".*pp"?
> | Well they're not really complete .cpp files, and they're not
headers as such
> | either - more like snippets of code that get #included by various
> | files (the .cpp ones, and the configure script), so I wanted
> | distinctive to separate them from regular source and header files.
> Then perhaps using some extension that is not a common C++ extension
> would be better?
> I know that gcc uses .tcc for something similar to this.
> (mostly for explict template instantiations)
The Boost.Threads library uses the .inl extension is used for this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk