From: Eddie Diener (eddielee_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-11 19:04:21
David Abrahams wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> It's pretty good, but the reference is much too "flat". If you
>> really want to help the familiar programmer, you'll use all of the
>> hierarchical levels you have for a categorized reference. The parts
>> that familiar programmers mostly don't need to look at are currently
>> sucking up all those convenient navigational abilities.
> Wow, I just discovered the "headers" view seems to give me almost
> everything I need. I've seen it before, but it never occurred to me
> to use that as my main "reference" when there's another index with
> that label.
My amusement knows no end.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk