From: Hubert Holin (Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-15 09:45:42
Paris (U.E.), le 15/06/2004
In article <cac4o8$gfv$1_at_[hidden]>,
"Ken Hagan" <K.Hagan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> A year or so ago, there was a discussion/request in either csc++ or
> clc++m about whether std::complex was or should be layout compatible
> with Fortran's COMPLEX type. This sort of thing is a real issue for
> many scientific programmers. Presumably Jaap's 2D spinor is layout
> compatible with any other "complex" type. I'm suggesting that it
> would be desirable also to be type-compatible with the existing C++
> complex type, if that can be achieved by reasonable means.
What is the situation on that front? This is a very important
point, but IIRC required language support.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk