From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-21 11:01:35
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:44:59AM -0400, Douglas Paul Gregor wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> > |"JoaquÃn MÅ LÃ³pez MuÅoz" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:40D28963.573B38E9_at_tid.es...
> > |Aleksey talked about June 28th:
> > |
> > |http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg62871.php
> > |
> > |but seems like there has been no activity wrt to releasing
> > |Boost 1.32 since. Is that date still valid? I guess it is not,
> > |for the one week remaining is probably to little time to
> > |arrange everything.
> > I don't know how exactly we usually do this. Some people would like
> > one of my libraries, Boost.Range, to be included in the next version of boost.
> > If the june 28th is the deadline, I won't make it. If july 28th is the deadline,
> > I might be able to make it.
> You're including time to stabilize the code in that estimate, I assume? If
> we're to pull together a release in the near future, we'd want to get all
> major changes (new libraries, etc.) in "soon" and then have a week or two
> to whack the portability bugs that always crop up.
I'd like to second the deadline of 28th july if I can. I still need to do some work
on the string_algo library and the inclusion of Range library would save me a substantial
part of work on the documentation, that would have to be changed anyway afterwards.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk