From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-23 07:15:34
David Abrahams wrote:
> > Ehm... the guidelines are a bit contrived. Why did you decide to kill the
> > definitions in minmax.hpp?
> There are several substantial threads about why the old definitions didn't
I'm still at loss. Why minmax.hpp can't just undef macroses? And the
guidelines Eric posted are pretty complex for "I want ADL" case. Why that
can't be wrapped in a function?
And really, what was the problem with the current minmax.hpp, except that it
did not work on gcc-2.95-stlport?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk