Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-23 07:15:34

David Abrahams wrote:

> > Ehm... the guidelines are a bit contrived. Why did you decide to kill the
> > definitions in minmax.hpp?
> There are several substantial threads about why the old definitions didn't
> work.

I'm still at loss. Why minmax.hpp can't just undef macroses? And the
guidelines Eric posted are pretty complex for "I want ADL" case. Why that
can't be wrapped in a function?

And really, what was the problem with the current minmax.hpp, except that it
did not work on gcc-2.95-stlport?

- Volodya

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at