Re: [boost] Re: [1.32 release] Boost.Test plan

From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-26 02:49:29

>>Boost.Test needs to be stable in the weeks leading up to the
>>branch-for-release.
> 
> Unfortunately I had other commitments that prevented me from finishing it by
> that time. I have several long promised features I hoped to include into
> this release. As I sad I will make sure it is as painless as possible.
> And I am bound to be finished before branch for release.

I think Dave's point was that Boost.Test is special: It has to freeze 
earlier because the regression tests rely on it.

Darren