Re: [boost] Re: result_ofOp, operator should be a template parameter

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-05 19:06:05

On Jul 5, 2004, at 6:43 PM, David Abrahams wrote:

> Doug Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Absolutely. But it's a solution we can use to make C++98/C++0x
>> portable libraries. At least, that's the idea
>> :)
>
> Why don't we implement it for compilers that support some kind of
> typeof, and then get Arkadiy Vertlyjb's (sp?) typeof library going?

If only I could remember what compilers supported it :) I know newer 
versions of GCC do.

> Then we can slap a more-portable interface on it and start using it
> all over Boost ;-)

Something like result_of_N<F, T1, T2, ..., TN>, I'd expect. Is 
Arkadiy's typeof lib going in some time soon?

        Doug