|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-05 23:31:05
"Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>>> Actually, discerning that you probably meant
>>>> libs/concept_check/using_concept_check.htm and searching the whole
>>>> file for 'applicatino' finding nothing and replying to your post
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> was easier than adding a new Boost developer to the project. If
>>>> you're concerned about saving work for others, please post a
>>>> _patch_ next time.
>>>
>>> "Example
>>> Getting back to the earlier motivating example, one good applicatino
>>> of concept checks would be to insert function_requires() at the top
>>> of std::stable_sort() to make sure the template parameter type models
>>> RandomAccessIterator."
>>
>> That's not a patch... but as I was trying to say, the text is already
>> correct in CVS.
>
> My WinCVS is now dead on my machine but I could have sweared when I last
> updated the file, earlier today, it showed the error. I am glad the typo has
> been fixed in the meantime. No doubt there is a way to generate a CVS patch
> and I might be able to figure it out by next year <g> . Yes, I find CVS, and
> all its equivalences, a gruesome joke on programmers.
cvs diff -du filename
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk