From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-06 13:52:49
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:31:23 -0500, Jeremy Siek <jsiek_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Believe me, I'm not trying to exclude physicists or anyone. I'm highly
> favor of there being lots of numerical libraries in Boost. There can
> be many different concepts with the name "Matrix", they'll just be in
> different namespaces.
Does this imply that a library such as libcalc.sourceforge.net which
has bit of overlap with uBLAS but is targeted towards those who want
some quick to use matrices would be a canidate for boost?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk